|
home
why
how
evidence
resources
contact
about
us
|
attacks
on religious organizations
The NEA can't hide its malice toward religious organizations in Resolution
C-14 (2000), which condemns "extremist" groups. According
to NEA publications,1 the extremists
"include groups or parents with a conservative religious affiliation
who criticize the public schools for one reason or another."2
The NEA specifically warns against groups like Concerned Women for America,
Eagle Forum, Family Research Council, Christian Coalition, American Family
Association, Focus on the Family, and the Traditional Values Coalition.
More religious angst appears in an NEA newsletter called In Brief.
Here, the NEA defines
the "radical right" as "a wide range of groups including
free-market conservatives, anti-government and anti-union ideologues, and
religious fundamentalists with a political agenda."3
Then the NEA charges that "radical right extremists
would exclude
and devalue people who are poor, people of color, and people who are in
any way different from them." According to the NEA, "the ultimate
aim of the extreme right is the destruction of public education in America."
The union further categorizes the "right wing" as "religious
zealots and blatantly racist hate groups" that work on the local and
national level as a "well-organized network of activist organizations,
think tanks, and private foundations."
In an apparent attempt to neutralize this "radical right" the
NEA supports a number of groups that openly attack religious organizations.
One such group is People for the American Way (PAW), which received $654,000
from the NEA during the past decade.4
According to their own website, PAW "monitors the power of right-wing
groups, documenting their connections, funding, and reporting on their
political influence." They warn that "right-wing organizations
come in all shapes and sizes, from think tanks to legal groups, local and
national lobbying organizations, foundations and media forums. At any given
moment, the Right is at work in our public school systems, courthouses,
in Congress and state assemblies
promoting
regressive policies that seek to drive wedges between and among Americans."
PAW refers to organizations like the American Family Association, Christian
Coalition, Concerned Women for America, Eagle Forum, Family Research Council,
Focus on the Family, National Right to Life Committee, and Traditional
Values Coalition as the "radical right" that seeks to divide
America, destroy public education, and persecute homosexuals. Their
website also implies a "vast right-wing conspiracy" by observing
that "these often single-issue groups have the ability to create multi-issue
networks that can respond on a wide range of issues." Showcasing signs
of "conspiracy" paranoia, they boast of a library that catalogs
"over 800 groups and almost 300 individuals documenting their activities
and providing information about their efforts to reshape society."
The National Organization of Women (NOW) is another group that receives
financial support from the NEA while condemning many religious groups.5
Regarding legislation to define marriage as the union of a man and woman,
NOW levels the following charge: "This anti-gay and anti-marriage
initiative comes from the same right-wing crowd that claims to be pro-marriage
and pro-family. This mean-spirited attempt at enshrining marriage discrimination
in the Constitution reveals that their true agenda is not marriage and
family promotion but discrimination
and exclusivity."6
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) authored a study called Report
on the Religious Right in Washington State,7
which takes aim at groups like the American Family Association, Christian
Coalition, and Focus on the Family. The report was financially
supported by the WEA (along with the Lesbian and Gay Rights Project
of the ACLU Foundation). Frieda Takamura of the WEA and GLSEN is also mentioned
as a research assistant for the project.
The ACLU report also promotes a publication called What's Left After
the Right: A Resource Manual for Educators,8
by Dr. Janet L. Jones. The manual was written
for the WEA and funded by the NEA.9
Its stated goal is to provide basic background information about the "Far
Right Movement" and "stimulate more in depth investigations of
the Righteous Right." Religious conservatives are colored as "extremists,"
and Dr. Jones claims that these and other critics
of public education are self-serving, power seeking, out for revenge, or
seeking financial gain.10 After
the Right also mentions several "ultra-conservative" organizations
as supposed enemies of public education: textbook critics Mel and Norma
Gabler, the Heritage Foundation, Pro-Family Forum, Concerned Women for
America, Eagle Forum, the American Freedom Coalition, and the National
Association of Christian Educators/Citizens for Excellence in Education.
Jones then attacks "the philosophical foundation of ultra-conservatism"
while identifying the following causes that receive conservative support:
home schooling, traditional family rights, creationism, American patriotism,
right to life, and school prayer.
Much like PAW, the ACLU fears that groups like the Christian Coalition
and Focus on the Family "have built a powerful political apparatus
-- a network of national and local organizations, mailing lists, media,
and training schools, with an ability to mobilize followers quickly."11
The ACLU also observes that the Christian Coalition "is structured
like a political party, organized to exert influence from the precinct
to the national level." Ironically, this description would fit the
NEA and it's affiliates if not for one major difference -- teachers are
forced to pay for politics, while the Christian Coalition gives its members
a choice.
1 See the following publications: Janet L. Jones, Ed.D., What
's Left After the Right? A Resource Manual for Educators; Brian K.
Baker, Censorship in public schools, NJEA Review, May 1997; Deanna
R. Duby, Attacks on Public Education & the Radical Right, NJEA
Review, April 1996; Bargaining Protection for Public Education: Resource
Manual, Michigan Education Association, 1996; Primer on the Extremist
Attacks on Public Education, California Teachers Association, Prepared
by: CTA Human Rights Department and CTA Division of Government Relations;
The Radical Right, Ohio Education Association Mega Conference, March
3-5, 1995; CAPE: Combat Attacks on Public Education, Illinois Education
Association, 1996; and The Real Story Behind 'Paycheck Protection' The
Hidden Link Between Anti-Worker and Anti-Public Education Initiatives:
An Anatomy of the Far Right, NEA, Washington, DC, 1998.
2 Perry L. Glanzer & Travis R. Pardo, Grading The NEA, Focus
on the Family, 2000.
3 NEA Paranoia in Print, Education Reporter, Eagle Forum Education
& Legal Defense Fund, July 1998.
4 Perry L. Glanzer & Travis R. Pardo, Grading The NEA, Focus
on the Family, 2000.
5 According to Education's Iron Triangle: Uncovering the Values and
Beliefs of the NEA, AFT, and PTA, by Dick Carpenter, Travis Pardo &
Charlene Haar, 2002, the NEA contributed $2,000 to NOW each year from 1991-1994,
$500 in 1995, and $200 in 1997 (data gathered from NEA Contributions, Strategic
Activity 1.3, Component 1). Also see NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund,
1998 Annual Report, 19.
6 Say No to Marriage Discrimination in the Constitution, National
Organization for Women, www.now.org, September 2, 2003.
7 Dan Junas, Report on the Religious Right in Washington State,
American Civil Liberties Union, 1995.
8 Janet L. Jones, What's Left After the Right? A Resource Manual for
Educators.
9 Suzanne U. Clark, Brownshirts in the Classroom, 1992.
10 Psychological Adjustments in Public Schools, Watchman Fellowship,
www.watchman.org, 2003.
11 Dan Junas, Report on the Religious Right in Washington State,
American Civil Liberties Union, 1995.
|